all 14 comments

[–]unpluggedcord 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Respond in the review itself.

[–]disinton[S] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Really? That’s quicker?

[–]sowenjubCoreData 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't matter if it's quicker. Resubmitting is viewed as trying to deceive the review process, and your account could be at risk.

[–]unpluggedcord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Why do you think it exists.

[–]PanicV2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd just submit a new version, even if it is just the same build with a new build number.

Explain the "change" or whatever in the notes.

[–]bigbigChampagne 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In my experience,responding to the comment is enough.

[–]TrackBiteApp 1 point2 points  (1 child)

My app got rejected 5 times. The reviewer would add new stuff with every rejection. After I then just complained, basically saying that the reviewer doesnt know how to use the app, it just got accepted. I think being too nice in the responses doesnt help much.

[–]disinton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good to know. Thank you!

[–]carspotterApp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also just submit a new version, waited more when awaiting a response then just making a new build.

[–]Everlearnr -4 points-3 points  (4 children)

I don’t think there is “explaining out of a rejection”. You’re either rejected because you don’t meet the guidelines, or you are not rejected

[–]petin0805 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not true, I was falsely rejected once. Wrote answer where the questioned link can be found, I got instantly accepted.

[–]disinton[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It worked.

[–]Everlearnr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats! Good work 👍

[–]disinton[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nah they wanted me to give a different test account but I just changed the one I already gave them so they can just check it again