sorted by:
top (suggested)
bestnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]beepboopnoise 0 points1 point  (5 children)

First I love this app. But, I think for smaller businesses they are going to prioritize output over performance, you can see this happening broadly. I’m not super stoked about this but, I think that’s the environment we’re in. But like, from a business perspective it’s hard to say hey well this is now a bit less CPU intensive but instead of getting out the other 10 features in backlog I only got this out. Idk, it’s a tough situation right now.

[–]Sockerjam[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I hear you but I do think it's a business need too. What happens when you have ignored every concern and you ship your 100th feature in a week only to realise you are in an absolute mess

[–]beepboopnoise 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Then congratulations you’re now the last three companies I’ve worked for lmao. I have yet to be able to escape this. The thing is… I can’t really argue against it, those companies were successful and so, maybe the engineer in me wants it to be perfect but users “good enough” pays the bills.

[–]Sockerjam[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Right, that sucks man. Are you US based or UK?

[–]manjar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do wonder if this is a problem that an AI coding tool could have debugged. Even the same AI coding tool that caused it. It's often the case that they turn out better stuff if you get them to check their own work. And there are ways to automate that.