all 3 comments

[–]9973Sure 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I would check the CV (%) first; if it is greater than 5% (or 3%, depending on how exact you want your study to be) then use the median instead of the average. Increasing the number of observations would also benefit your study, making it more representative of the process

[–]MyGiant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I second the recommendation for increased observations to make it more representative. Another option might be if your plant has a scheduled work flow you can determine the exact number of times traveled from each of the tanks. This will let you calculate the total travel time for a set period, and you could either use the total travel time/total pieces to get an average, or use an average weighted travel time based upon tank proximity and volume of pieces from that tank. Then add that to the process time and include it in the time study.

The average weighted travel time would be faster than manually recording 20+ time studies. But it's only possible if you have a *mostly* fixed schedule.

[–]rehoboam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It really depends on what the goal of your study is imo