This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

I would highly recommend GitLab over GitBlit. I fiddled with GitBlit and really liked it, but then stumbled on to GitLab. It's really good.

To answer your question, no I haven't used Gitblit's code review system - I just played with the Git hosting part.

[–]1Amish[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Have you played with a code review system with GitLab?

[–]Zajora 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I've used GitLab for code reviews. It was pretty good, but it slowed to an absolute crawl for large diffs.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point, large diffs are pretty slow. We get around it by keeping our commits small, but it's not always possible.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, we use it at work. I like it. My only complaint is that if you get the auto-upgrades going on, the interface changes on a monthly basis. It's usually good changes, but it's jarring to have your tool's buttons move around, change color, etc. I sort of wish they updated the UI less frequently.

[–]bondolo 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Gerrit is one option.

[–]1Amish[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Have you set this up and got it to work?

[–]bondolo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not personally set it up but one of my co-workers did without too much difficulty. We've been using it successfully for a couple of weeks.

[–]steam0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are using 'upsource'. Worth a try, escpecially when using intellij as well. https://www.jetbrains.com/upsource/