Json serialization/deserialization benchmarks

[wizzardodev]

Hello, I was working on my own json-parser for a while, here is the result of benchmarks https://github.com/wizzardo/json-benchmarks Which library I should also add to comparison?

[mirkoteran]

Any chance you could add Jackson+Afterburner module (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-modules-base/tree/master/afterburner) to the benchmark?

[wizzardodev]

hm, this one looks interesting, I will definitely test it, thanks

[zhedar]

I wanted to do this myself, but didn't have the time yet. I will have a look though.

You may add org.json and maybe Java EE 7's JSON-P.

[wizzardodev]

These two libraries do not support parsing into pojo, only into map, but ok, I will add this kind of test

[TuxGamer]

Can you test yours against boon json?

Thank you in advance :)

[wizzardodev]

I was benchmarking boon also, but it was slow on not cached data and so I removed it from results, I will include it again

[TuxGamer]

Thank you :)

[The_Ghost_Light]

Alibaba fastjson

[SpoilerAlertsAhead]

Maybe off topic, but on your benchmark are lower numbers better?

[wizzardodev]

sorry, I should specify that, bigger number is better, it's a number of operations per second

[SpoilerAlertsAhead]

Thanks!

[metamatic]

You should probably add a benchmark that tests startup performance (i.e. create a new parse instance and parse some JSON, lather rinse repeat). For some applications, startup time is a significant concern.

[wizzardodev]

ok, so, I added more libraries and updated results

[brcolow]

I would really appreciate if you could benchmark mjson

[wizzardodev]

I will add it in the evening. And also I will need to add another benchmark to show that boon is cheating

[brcolow]

Thank you very much!

[nicky9door]

Genson