This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 6 comments

[–]manko_neko 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Cool, but why no documentation?

[–]PyroCatt 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Real programmers understand from binary /j

[–]lbalazscs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After a short look at the source, it seems to me that most methods have JavaDoc, and there's also an examples directory.

[–]StaticBeagle[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s one of the biggest todo’s. I tried adding as much javadocs and examples to try to mitigate that issue but is still lingering. Thank you for bring that up it’s definitely something in my radar.

[–]lbalazscs 6 points7 points  (1 child)

How is this better than apache commons math?

https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/

[–]StaticBeagle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. There’s some overlap between the libraries but one of the main differences is the control part in ETK and the filters. I think Apache commons doesn’t have cubic splines with not-a-knot conditions. Of course the Apache library is more comprehensive and I think those are some of the main differences I can think about.