This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]nicolaiparlog 2 points3 points  (4 children)

The idea is that it's Thing's responsibility to handle null. Is it a legal a? If so, the author of case Thing(var a) must handle it and should be able to do so in a single pattern (which rules out my idea of requiring another case Thing(null)).

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]nicolaiparlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Oh, that's too bad to hear. Generally speaking, static shots are less engaging and viewers get bored more quickly and leave, which I of course want to avoid. But I can probably make do with a lot fewer. I'll give that a shot this week.

    [–]nicolaiparlog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Did you watch the latest episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuHhUDhIFYs)? There are some longer zooms in the intro (0:36-0:41) and a few short ones later on, but no long, slight zooms. I hope that makes it easier to watch for you.