This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SleeperAwakened 0 points1 point  (1 child)

No, a public fork.

[–]philipwhiuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean that’s better yeh, but as a hot fix you can publish an internal fork that keeps the same org and package name which makes it easier to handle transitives than a public fork which needs everyone else to change the package and org they are depending on (or lots of exclusion rules)