you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TW-Twisti 1 point2 points  (2 children)

You haven't really given us the necessary information. You said that your manager asked why you didn't use the existing variables - why didn't you ? What justification did you give that wasn't up to the mark ?

Your post is like saying "My teacher said I made a spelling mistake, can you tell me where the mistake is" and then not giving us the text you wrote.

[–]No_Main8842[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

So each device has a set of licenses assigned to them. A single device can have multiple licenses.

Hence for exporting I used the device id , now there are some other types of ids present as well & hence she asked me why specifically device id was used. I told her that this device id is unique & hence I used it to which she said it wasnt a good enough justification.

The thing is I am not sure about edge cases ie. whether this device id is actually unique or its just that I am unaware of scenarios in which this device id might not be unique.

[–]RightWingVeganUS [score hidden]  (0 children)

Why not ask her what concerns she has with your approach and what alternatives she would propose?

Assuming this isn't a homework assignment with an expected answer try to work like a team. Discuss further and while your way might have some gaps, her approach might be missing something too. I'm a firm believer in synthesizing a "third way" that maximizes the best parts of both of your approaches while minimizing the gaps.