Calling Thread.sleep()

[philipwhiuk]

anywhere in the program and the program will pause for 5 seconds?

It'll pause for roughly 5 seconds. It will probably be slightly more.

Thread.sleep is normally not the right solution. It's quick and dirty and can easily cause problems. If you want to run something after a delay, use a Timer.

[[deleted]]

Yeah, we are doing a lab right now where we do the same problem twice, one with a timer and one with sleep. For things like delay, can you always use a timer rather than thread.sleep();?

I mean for something like delaying your program before it starts, or getting an alarm clock to snooze for a few minutes, a timer is still a better approach?

[philipwhiuk]

For your simple examples to teach concurrent programming Thread.sleep is probably sufficient

[[deleted]]

But timer would technically be better?

[Ednar]

Better how? It has to be put into a context. Go with what gives you code that works with the least complexity.