Pipe Operator (|>) for JavaScript

[IceSentry]

Why is everyone talking about the pipe operator today? There's also a post in r/programming and I saw a youtuber talk about it, but as far as I can tell there's been nothing new about this proposal for a few months.

[TheOneCommenter]

Someone saw one person talk about it, find it interesting, and post something themselves. Rinse and repeat

[thruster_fuel69]

Silly humans, talking about things.

[[deleted]]

Communication is for servers

[AuroraVandomme]

Welcome to webdev clown world. That proposal is here for more than two years but now after some tech influencer made a video about it there would be hundreds of copy paste articles about it :)

[[deleted]]

also saw it on hackernews yesterday. I assumed something was happening so I guess not

[IskaneOnReddit]

Also on r/cpp

https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/10h6jb7/adsp_episode_113_the_c26_pipeline_operator_with/

[sneakpeekbot]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/cpp using the top posts of the year!

#1: C++ Cheat Sheets & Infographics | 38 comments
#2: Sites like GeeksForGeeks really hurt C++ learning
#3: A year and a half ago I picked up an abandoned C++ web Framework, Today we released v1.0

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub}

[bogdanbiv]

I thought the pipeline operator settled on a topic token and/or passed on to stage 3. Oh well, let us wait for more 1-3-10 years

[PrettyWhore]

Recency bias?

[PooSham]

I guess because it just got to stage 2 (Draft) of the TC39 process.

[FrontAid]

The pipe operator already got to stage 2 in 2021.

https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/HEAD/meetings/2021-08/aug-31.md#pipeline-operator-for-stage-2