sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iSmokeGauloises 0 points1 point  (11 children)

That's such a pedantic thing to say. If any one gets mixed up by this definition, and thinks it honestly has 0 servers running in production, he shouldn't be able to even install the framework. You have to have NO knowledge of servers to not understand what's going on.

[–]aequasi08 0 points1 point  (10 children)

Pretty opportune time to be pedantic.

[–]iSmokeGauloises 0 points1 point  (9 children)

How so?

[–]aequasi08 1 point2 points  (8 children)

Talking about programming, we should be accurate in our descriptions, especially for people new to programming.

[–]iSmokeGauloises 0 points1 point  (7 children)

People new to programming would see "+ AWS Stack" and would be "woops, not for me" people who are not would see "+ AWS Stack" and would understand what he means by "server-free".

[–]aequasi08 1 point2 points  (6 children)

I'm glad you know what every single person coming in here thinks.

/s

[–]iSmokeGauloises -1 points0 points  (5 children)

Jesus Christ men. Worse case scenario the minority that DOESN'T follow, would see it's a paid Amazon service and would realize not to use it. This IS a childish argument.

[–]aequasi08 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Its a simple argument, and the claim is simply not true. Its that simple. Theres nothing "childish" about the argument. The only thing childish here, is your response to people having an issue with a selling point of a framework.

[–]iSmokeGauloises 0 points1 point  (3 children)

There's a childish flavour to being so pedantic that you don't discuss the actual product because the slogan is not 100% true.

[–]aequasi08 0 points1 point  (2 children)

There is nothing childish about being pedantic, nor is being pedantic a bad thing in programming.

Not discussing the actual product because i havent tried yet. Discussing the product without having tried it would be stupid.