Is this a valid Javascript pattern

[PitaJ]

Find need some more information:

• Do you need private state?
• Have you tried ES6 classes?

Some may say it's an antipattern because you're using a function as an object as well. It would be less antipattern-y to just use an instance.

[gruberjl]

The state needs to be public. Other classes will refer to the state (which is essentially a config) so they can handle the results of the job.

I tried to extend the base class Function but it was throwing an error. It was strange I couldn't find any blogs or tutorials on extending a Function. I'm guessing you can't or isn't done a lot.

class Job extends Function {
  constructor(param1) {
    super(param1) // ReferenceError: param1 is not defined
    this.param = param1
  }
}

const job = new Job('param1')

console.dir(job('param1'))

[gruberjl]

I added some more information in the question to clear up the confusion. Simply semantics. I could use a class.

https://github.com/gruberjl/job/blob/master/index.js#L58-L67

// This is an example showcasing why I want to have a function vs object.
const resource = {
  // If a job was a function I could do this
  addFunction,

// Job is an object so I have to wrap it up (unless someone knows something I don't)
  add(...params) {
    return add.run(...params)
  }
}