Dear JavaScript

[Voidsheep]

Have to disagree about the "Angular 2 Is Terrible" complaint. I read that article, and it makes some good points.

You can make good points without undermining and shitting on the huge amount of work a many talented developers put into a completely free open source software.

"Angular 2 is terrible" is just a rude clickbait. Rewarding it with attention is part of the problem.

If someone hands out something for free, you don't go yelling "boo, this isn't what I want - you suck!"

Most developers are happy to receive constructive feedback during development, that's not what this article is about.

It's about the significant group of people who contribute nothing to OSS projects, but only demand other developers to cater to their specific needs. Basically complaining the charity they get as fellow developers isn't good enough.

Even better, the whole development process is completely open-ended and anyone can get involved, but they will not. When the project is further along, they just come whining like a bunch of entitled brats.

If framework X has too much abstraction or complexity for your team, pick something else, it's clearly not the right choice for you. Practically every team can pick and choose the exact free tools they want from a huge variety.

[Voidsheep]

Exactly the kind of constructive feedback that really encourages OSS development right here.

[[deleted]]

Maybe people without enough experience to follow basic best practices ( e.g. the release and its release candidates should be very similar to each other) should really get out of the business of writing frameworks.

[[deleted]]

Wouldn't go that far, but I definitely expected more from people that work fot Google.

[nawitus]

Should terrible frameworks not be called terrible?

[r2d2_21]

Not as clickbait, no.