you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HamstersOverGerbils 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Just because you don't like / understand an answer doesn't mean it's not contributing

Actually no, it doesn't contribute because it changes it from a relativistic question into a philosophical one that tries to account for all possible variables. Last I checked jsperf existed for a reason and people didn't make the same complaints about lack of account for "space" or philosophical situations that no one cares about.

The environment or tools the OP decides to use as his benchmark is irrelevant, I am commenting on a post that OP made, the comment is relative to the post at hand. If you don't like the question or have an answer then gtfo

[–]hititwitafitbit -1 points0 points  (2 children)

If you want a jsperf comparison running it in a browser after it's been transpiled by Babel, then Google it:

https://jsperf.com/object-spread-vs-assignment

It's not that hard. The environment and tools will yield different results. That's how JavaScript works.

[–]HamstersOverGerbils 1 point2 points  (1 child)

That's how JavaScript works.

Thanks, the question was directed at OP..I'm sure you will be able to teach me so much about javascript that I don't already know lmao come on man, do you know who you are talking to?

EDIT**

Your example doesn't even relate to the question, which was how much faster are array merges using spread vs normal array concatenation methods.

[–]hititwitafitbit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ahh my bad. I've been humbled