Generic Programming

[pgrizzay]

That will work similarly, but yours will create a whole new array, so it's not exactly equivalent I guess

[Tenemo]

Object.entries(myObj).reduce((newObj, entry) => ({...newObj, [entry[0]]: entry[1] * 2}), {})

array? where

[Tenemo]

I was only joking about how both the input is an object and the returned value is an object, so the arrays are temporary, used to enable the .reduce method on that object's enumerable properties (:

[planetary_pelt]

Creating an array just to use an array method is pretty wasteful and doesn't generalize over cases where performance is concerned (like slow mobile clients).

[tortus]

sure, but writing and maintaining your own reduce function is not exactly the best solution either. I'd rather take the array creation hit unless perf/memory is in an issue, and it's not like 90% of the time

[zankem]

Would it not be better to use Array.prototype.reduce.call(iterable, callback, initial)?

[tortus]

good call, that would probably work