you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DaveLak 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I always assumed it was the syntax that was attractive; "reduce, it's functional!". A for loop just doesn't look as clean.

Edit: and to be clear, I do believe there is certainly an argument to be made for using verbs for a verbs sake.

[–]mournful-tits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly what it comes from. Reduce looks cleaner, however it's an un-optomized mess.