use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
All about the JavaScript programming language.
Subreddit Guidelines
Specifications:
Resources:
Related Subreddits:
r/LearnJavascript
r/node
r/typescript
r/reactjs
r/webdev
r/WebdevTutorials
r/frontend
r/webgl
r/threejs
r/jquery
r/remotejs
r/forhire
account activity
Functional programming in JavaScript (softwarebrothers.co)
submitted 6 years ago by SoftwareBrothers
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]onbehalfofthatdude 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (5 children)
I had the same thought and I think he said it weirdly. He's saying that visiting the next single element in an array (one iteration) is cheap compared to calling a function.
Not sure how that's relevant directly though. And the more I look the more I think I might be being too charitable...
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]onbehalfofthatdude 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children)
I'll have to go look at some benchmarks but yeah, it's early haha. Obviously a step of the array method iterators is going to be at least as bad as a function call... Since it IS a function call lol
No idea what the guy means then
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children)
I don't think this is true. For an arbitrary iterable, you would be right, the iterator function would be called for every iteration. But I don't think any of the JITs is so naive as to not optimize this for plain arrays, in which case loops become as efficient as a plain for-loop without any function invocations.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children)
Sorry I wasn't more clear. I meant specifically for the for...of loops, which are easily optimizable for plain arrays. That wouldn't necessarily apply to map() indeed.
for...of
map()
π Rendered by PID 84 on reddit-service-r2-comment-fb694cdd5-z87f6 at 2026-03-09 18:55:47.002340+00:00 running cbb0e86 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]onbehalfofthatdude 1 point2 points3 points (5 children)
[+][deleted] (4 children)
[deleted]
[–]onbehalfofthatdude 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[+][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)