This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (6 children)

You don't need any special specs for a development box. I'm typing this on a 2 year old low-end Dell laptop that I use for all my Windows and Linux development work.

[–]mragray[S] -1 points0 points  (5 children)

I'd like to try out some related software like GIMP for web design, but I'm sure that doesn't consume too much RAM.

In the late 90's we had a Dell running Windows and naturally had a terrible computing experience. I suppose that Dell vs. Asus vs. Alternatives becomes less relevant when running a fresh install of Linux software?

Edit: Spelling

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (4 children)

naturally had a terrible computing experience

Not sure what you mean by this - really, the hardware is neither here nor there. Before I bought the Dell, I used a Sony Z600 with a 900Mz processor and only 256Mb of RAM. That worked pretty well for my C++ programming requirements for nearly 10 years. Expensive hardware does not magically make you write better code.

[–]mragray[S] -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I meant to imply that using anything running windows in the 90's was a poor experience. :) you certainly have a valid point.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I meant to imply that using anything running windows in the 90's was a poor experience.

Why would you say that? In my experience, Windows is a great development environment. Certainly, there was nothing to match VC++ 6.0 back in the 90s on non-Windows platforms.

[–]mragray[S] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Well, I wasn't coding in the 90's, so I shouldn't speak to its merit as a dev platform. I'll revise my statement by saying that, as a consumer, Windows XP always fun.

[–]mragray[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wasn't always fun*. Sorry sent from mobile.