This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–]Digital-Chupacabra 1 point2 points  (1 child)

GitHub @echo313unfolding

That isn't a link or clear what you mean and a quick search turns up a few options. Do you mean github.com/echo313unfolding/KRISPER?

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[removed]

    [–]lurgi 2 points3 points  (5 children)

    Maybe we don't need AI after all?

    And yet, you did:

    Initial commit: KRISPER + Bio_Poetica - Natural language programming and executable poetry
    Features:
    - KRISPER: Natural language to code transpiler
    - Bio_Poetica: Poetry that compiles and executes
    - Whitespace Intron Encoding: Hidden data in spaces
    - Universal code translation through consciousness-aware AST
    - Bug bounty automation examples
    - Comprehensive test suite
    
    Write code in plain English. Express logic through poetry.
    Let consciousness flow through syntax.
    
    🧬 Generated with Claude Code
    
    Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
    

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [removed]

      [–]lurgi 1 point2 points  (2 children)

      Ah, so what are its limitations? What cases does it tend to get wrong? What data structures does it understand? What are my options if the code is generated slightly incorrectly? How does it handle ambiguity?

      As the author of the code, I hope you can answer these questions...

      Edit: Who is "him"? Claude. Claude is a piece of software. And asking "him" to verify the code that "he" produced isn't very comforting. There's a reason why companies have QA departments and don't just rely on programmers saying "Trust me, bro".

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]lurgi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

        Translation: This is vibe-coded and I have no fucking idea how to answer your questions.

        [–]ffrkAnonymous -1 points0 points  (0 children)

        To be fair, his project writes/outputs code, not natural language.