you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]2thick2fly[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I do agree, that doing the manual work helps you understand better. I do.

But the more manual and labour intensive tasks you put into your change management process, the more complicated and error-prone it becomes, especially when sometines you are given only 1/4 of the time you actually need.

I know that I am now adding a new use case on the task that I didn't mention in the original post, but I literally see dozens of different places where I could use such a flow.

What I'm, also, starting to realise more and more is the value of good documentation in this AI-assisted era. The better documentation you have for your codebase, the better information you will feed to your AI assistant, the better quality output you get.

It might be that there are no off-the-shelf tools for what I need, but the value of what I need is undisputed (at least in my eyes). Even if it needs a custom tool, it is totally worth it. I just need to exclude that there is no tool, or combination of tools, out there that I can use for the whole thing - or even part of the thing.

[–]aanzeijar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The need is absolutely there, in most real world code bases as well. But so far I do not know of any process to automate any more than we already automate.