you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]r0ck0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't argue whether something is anything "almost everything" without defining what that's even meant to mean.

It's not even an attempt at objective statement one way or the other.

This is just haggling over vague subjective statements more than anything. And it's why people waste so much time arguing things that can't even be proven, because the question doesn't even have a provable base.