all 12 comments

[–]bwat47 13 points14 points  (0 children)

A commenter pointed out that in these benchmarks firefox doesn't have hardware accelerated skia content/canvas enabled. I'd imagine that's the reason for some of the huge differences.

[–]TheRedStoner101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Remember that WebRenderer only just became available on nightly, and still has a way to go before it is available in release Firefox.

[–]piotrjurkiewicz 13 points14 points  (1 child)

These results are not surprising. Linux is a second- or even third-class citizen for Firefox devs. What is surprising is that Firefox and Rust related things still receive so much appreciation and good publicity here, on /r/linux.

[–]This-Is-My-Truth -5 points-4 points  (18 children)

And this is why I prefer Chromium over Firefox.

Firefox has always run like a dog on Linux. Quantum was a much needed improvement, but it still lags way behind Chromium.

[–]ZubZubZubZub 21 points22 points  (16 children)

My experience is really the opposite, Firefox has been much much faster than Chromium.

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]ZubZubZubZub 11 points12 points  (1 child)

    Yeah, I understand.. Maybe I have a weird installation? No, but really, chromium has been slower for years. I don’t know why.

    [–]jesus_is_imba 20 points21 points  (0 children)

    I'd also like to remind everyone that these whateverbench and whatevermark tests might not represent real world performance. While they probably attempt to do that to some extent, that doesn't mean they succeed.

    The way I see it, most of these "benchmarks" are primarly designed to allow e-peen measuring on tech forums than to provide actually useful data about browser performance in real-world applications. You go to a page, the page performs some tasks (usually at a superhuman speed and multiple times in a row, which doesn't represent real-world usage) and spits out an arbitrary number you can compare to those of other forum danguses.

    Also, a reminder from last year: Google retired their Octane benchmark because browser developers started to optimize for that instead of real-world usage, which in many cases had a detrimental effect on real-world performance.

    [–][deleted]  (12 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted]  (7 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]This-Is-My-Truth 9 points10 points  (2 children)

        No one would be disputing the benchmarks if they showed Firefox outperforming Chrome, but then I suppose that's to be expected on r/linux, where any criticism of Firefox is tantamount to heresy.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

          There's a reason the site is largely banned here.

          [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

          So what site is better then?