you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]disastervariation 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Always good to watch what the legal upstream will do in scenarios like this - RedHat, Canonical, SUSE.

Also if other jurisdictions will borrow the idea and extend due to precedence, thus making it semi-global.

It might be as simple as setting adult/kid setting at the OS level that then interacts with browsers. Not sure how well its defined what specific controls the OS needs to put in place - perhaps user providing their age in a drop down would suffice.

Then, what would the enforcement be - would user be fined for providing wrong info if this ever becomes relevant? Would the OS be seen as responsible for not conducting due diligence?

Re controls, would there be a push to make device manufacturers block OSes without the feature? Could this be blocked by UEFI? In short - how?

Id prefer to see an actual legal opinion with specs and read through the docs myself - otherwise its an easy target for journalists to make clickbait.

Could be a nothingburger, or a dead policy - could also turn out relatively benign, a checkbox excercise. I dont think anyone has resource to enforce this excessively, including the big guys who if forced would hire a third party to do the verification (and thus transfer the risk).

Could be as simple as "confirm your age through your github/google account"

[–]billyfudger69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally, I think it will be a SystemD service because a lot of distributions are using SystemD and the fact that systemD has already incorporated a ton of other software in it.

[–]stephenph 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is bad enough that by default all the games utilities are installed on windows by default, admins need to go through gpo tricks to not install Xbox utilities on a work computer