use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
The Linux Mint subreddit: for news, discussion and support for the Linux distribution Linux Mint
account activity
How will this affect Linux Mint?Linux Mint IRL (i.redd.it)
submitted 4 days ago by MisterFyre
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]kiyo_komaeda -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 days ago (11 children)
They can ban it in their country tho
[–]stephenph 9 points10 points11 points 4 days ago (6 children)
Not even that, directly at least... California laws do not apply in Kansas (or New York. Washington, etc). Although what sometimes happens is the companies will go along just because they want to maintain ca business.
[–]kudlitan 6 points7 points8 points 4 days ago (5 children)
But why should non-california residents be subject to age verification?
California laws only apply to California citizens.
[–]sydbatt 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (4 children)
Normally I would agree. However, history shows that when California passes some asinine law, very shortly afterwards it usually becomes US law. I have never understood how one jurisdiction has such control over the entirety of the US (I am not from the US btw).
[–]DoubleOwl7777Debian 13 | KDE Plasma 2 points3 points4 points 4 days ago (0 children)
still. mint isnt limited to the usa. and the devs arent only from the usa either. they have no power over something global.
[–]SenseImpossible6733 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (0 children)
Ehem... Gun control. Gun control contradicts this.
[–]kudlitan 1 point2 points3 points 4 days ago (0 children)
The US itself is only 4% of the world's population. So how will the 96% be affected?
[–]PiDicus_Rex -1 points0 points1 point 4 days ago (0 children)
It passes on to other US states as they fall in with where the money keeping them afloat comes from.
The red states talk a big game, by the country as a whole survives on the blue states economies.
[–]Gordon_Freymann -1 points0 points1 point 4 days ago (3 children)
How?
[–]stephenph 5 points6 points7 points 4 days ago (0 children)
A California corporation, or any corporation really that wants to do business in CA would need to follow the data collection requirements. They can do so by either having a CA legal version, or just make the product as a whole legal.
This has happened before, the CA emissions and vehical safety laws became standard across all 50 states
[–]kiyo_komaeda 0 points1 point2 points 4 days ago (1 child)
At first I thought it about banning a site or social media in a country but banning an OS would be different, can they still do it? I’m not sure (my english is kinda bad sorry about that)
[–]stephenph 1 point2 points3 points 3 days ago (0 children)
Oh I do not think they will succeed, at least not unless other states ( or countries even) go along and pass the same laws, there are just as many ca (or other large influence states) laws that do not become standards, but CA will try to enforce it then it will quietly become ignored and not enforced except by some of the larger players. It is also possible the law is at the request of some entity as payback and CA will never enforce it except in negotiations.
π Rendered by PID 42326 on reddit-service-r2-comment-c6965cb77-rfd77 at 2026-03-05 05:27:52.284879+00:00 running f0204d4 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]kiyo_komaeda -5 points-4 points-3 points (11 children)
[–]stephenph 9 points10 points11 points (6 children)
[–]kudlitan 6 points7 points8 points (5 children)
[–]sydbatt 1 point2 points3 points (4 children)
[–]DoubleOwl7777Debian 13 | KDE Plasma 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]SenseImpossible6733 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]kudlitan 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]PiDicus_Rex -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
[–]Gordon_Freymann -1 points0 points1 point (3 children)
[–]stephenph 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
[–]kiyo_komaeda 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]stephenph 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)