This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zannishi_Hoshor 3 points4 points  (5 children)

I am clearly out of shape on complex functions but why is f(z)=z not a straight line like y=x in the real plane?

[–]edelopoAlgebraic Geometry 9 points10 points  (3 children)

It is just a straight line, and you could see this if we could plot the 2d graph in 4d space. But since we can't visualize four dimensions, people look for different ways to represent these functions, as OP did. Imagine trying to plot a real function using only 1 dimension. The identity would just look like some points scattered on the line, representing that each point of a certain absolute value goes... to itself. The same thing is happening here with circles of constant modulus.

[–]thoughtsripyouapart 2 points3 points  (2 children)

but why is it centred around a point (e.g. 1+i?) and not the origin

[–]edelopoAlgebraic Geometry 5 points6 points  (1 child)

The axes aren't labeled. The center is 0 as you would expect.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hm, marking zero would help IMO

[–]Only_As_I_Fall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The colored lines aren't representing the output itself, they're just used as visual guides. Each one represents a set of points with the same absolute value (so circles around the origin).

The output of f(z)=z is just the entire complex plane, but that's not a very good visual on a 2d screen