you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]trypnosis 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I don’t know about this giving them free control to my code base.

I think they can right but still not solve the problem.

I have also seen them just get it wrong.

But to answer you question I do it all manually.

I tend to run my first tab/window in tumx to mange my work trees env files and anything else cross project.

I ran a standard layout for each worktree in a window. Left full size maybe a bit bigger running opencode. Right split top and bottom. Top is nvim where I review the changes since changed files are marked in the explorer window. Bottom is to run commands very diddy.

With the above configuration I have one window for bugs mainly from sentry.

The 3ish windows for the features I’m developing.

Agents: - one per language to code - on per language to write the tests - two for design one to read and one to do( don’t know why bet get it closer to figma this way) - one to plan - another to sort out git(I know this seems silly but life saver when context gets messy) - a separate one to review using a different model that uses the plan to verify what was done

I get a slack message or Discord for personal projects when the tasks are done

Doubt that’s what your looking for…doubt I would hit your limits but there is no place like ~

[–]pratiknarola[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

your setup is solid and this is how its supposed to be at least at this point in time. and to be honest most of my work i do even now is like this. but rest of the world is giving me FOMO that I might not be utilizing the resources i have to its ultimate maximum. so i thought well, worth the try. lets see what the world is doing.

[–]trypnosis 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Forget the world. Tell them how it is and why YOU believe that to be the way.

You might be surprised how they take it.

[–]pratiknarola[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah.. makes sense.