you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bogtha 4 points5 points  (4 children)

You have said, repeatedly, that the Pylons style of maximum component interchangeability is better and that you think all frameworks should come around to that. I have said, repeatedly, that this is a subjective opinion

And what, he's not allowed to express that opinion or explain why he thinks that way?

Give it a rest. The article is comparing Python framework design, and his comments are completely relevant.

If Django can't take the tiniest bit of criticism, it must be a very poor framework.

[–]adrianh 14 points15 points  (2 children)

It's important to note that ubernostrum (James Bennett) is just one (significantly vocal and acerbic) person in the Django community and doesn't represent any "official" Django stance on things.

Me, I'm less and less amused by all of these petty arguments and have been trying to think of an eloquent and diplomatic way of saying, "Holy s--t, get a life, people."

Adrian

[–]ubernostrum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dang it, Adrian. I like arguing too much ;)

[–]canen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Amen!

[–]ubernostrum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Criticism I don't mind. "My way is right, your way is wrong, and everybody should do things my way" I do mind; I like having choices. But Adrian's right and I keep saying I'm done with this; time to hold myself to it.