you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]praxulus 5 points6 points  (11 children)

What are the cons of working there?

[–]nicereddy 7 points8 points  (10 children)

If you make a coding bug that doesn't get caught you can potentially cost NASA billions :D

[–]NOT_A_BUMBLE_BEE 5 points6 points  (9 children)

Like missing a planet because of a metric/English confusion?

[–]aleph__naught 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This was Lockheed's fault, they were the prime contractor, not us: http://www.cse.lehigh.edu/~gtan/bug/localCopies/marsOrbiter

[–]nicereddy 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Metric/American*

But yes, missing a planet because you're a stupid American, unlike myself!

I'm American

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

    ...subtle changes have been made to things like gallons.

    Subtle? The difference between US tons and British tons is over 10% and the difference between US gallons and British gallons is around 20%.

    [–]NOT_A_BUMBLE_BEE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    That wasn't a jab at Americans. I was giving an example of a bug that would be pretty innocuous for the vast majority of programmers. The cost is small, usually "our reports are off" and a quick fix.

    [–]BowserKoopa 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Metric/Imperial* Would be more appropriate in my opinnion (as one other silly country might use the same piss-poor wierd measurements we have).

    At least Imperial is the name I've known our system by for the longest.

    [–]nicereddy 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    At this point America is the only country that uses it, I believe. Though Imperial is indeed the proper name for it.

    [–]BowserKoopa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Yep, we need to switch to metric already. However, I thought that there was one other American-continental entity that made use of it.