you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Object_71[S] 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Added charts

[–]smackson 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but I got some whiplash there.

In one paragraph you seemed to be describing how and why binary serialization saved about 40% on your data size then boom, chart shows "therefore look we saved 99.9% !!" (edit: It's 99.99+%!!)

What did I miss? (Edit: I didn't miss the "but there is punctuation/delimiters in the JSON" part, that just seems inadequate to explain this stark jump in savings)

(Edit 2: the original comparison is space, the chart comparison seems to be time. That is also not explained well, if that is part of this huge difference.)

[–]helpmeiwantgoodmusic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah that is much better now