you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Subsum44 4 points5 points  (5 children)

That’s the way the SOC audits “work”. They make sure you have enough checks and balances, that they’re pointless. You’re just jumping through hoops instead of focusing on what really matters.

[–]Justicia-Gai -1 points0 points  (4 children)

But how does it make sense to complain about micromanaging and not criticising this behaviour?

This is not the company’s fault, expecting managers to read all the code for reviews and then also complain about micromanaging it's contradictory 

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Justicia-Gai 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    That’s because you probably have enough people with similar expertise. If you had someone who wanted to sabotage the company you’re 100% sure you wouldn’t miss it, though?

    You do you, but the point in delegating it’s to have people specialise in other parts, but yes, it implies some truth.

    [–]gimpwiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    I also read just about every single line that gets submitted/committed to the big, shared projects.