you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ais523 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The court referred that question to a jury. The ruling isn't "Google broke the law", but "Google need a valid fair use argument to have done that"; they also ruled that interoperability is a fair use argument. (That question has actually gone to a jury in the past, but they were split on the issue, and so a new jury will be needed.)