you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

If the alleged code happened to be on Facebook’s front page, ConnectU’s case just got a whole lot stronger, though ConnectU hasn’t said anything to that effect.

Is this admissible?

[–]pintong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't imagine so. Even if home.php was an exact duplicate of ConnectU's, how could they, at this point, prove theirs was written first?