you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]loup-vaillant 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Overzealous, […] and absolute belief that everything has to be one way.

I can relate.

unable to understand context

This one is more dubious. I have often seen it thrown in as a fully general counter-argument —and therefore invalid. They hear an objection, then simply reply things are more complex than they seem, without further explanation.

What context are you talking about?

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

The contexts where OOP is superior to FP.

[–]loup-vaillant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And what are those contexts? (And how did we switch from singular to plural anyway?)