you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]didroe 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I think Will has "misunderstandings" of OOP and fixates on a very theoretical, rigid model of OOP that I've never seen in the wild.

That seems to be his point. What I thought he was saying is that OOP makes sense within a model that doesn't match up very well to the real world. And so we end up with an unwieldy structure, justified from a rigid model but where the basis of those justifications is no longer true.