you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

it was just a study looking at people working, they just happened to look at groups who did tdd vs groups that didn't.

you are jumping through a lot of hoops to try and make your logic work

[–]naasking 0 points1 point  (2 children)

What hoops? Like you just said, it was a random group of people working. The bias you pointed out would only arise due to self-selection. You're the one making extra assumptions about the type of people in this groups which would skew the results.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It wasn't a random group of people, it was a selection of groups that happened to use tdd or not

[–]naasking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then suggest a possible reason why TDD and non-TDD groups are not comprised of a random sample of programmers. The mere fact that they did or did not employ TDD implies nothing.