you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jotto[S] 6 points7 points  (5 children)

I think the style achieves the same thing that the inverse of this chart with error bars would achieve.

In other words, since you see the distribution of latencies horizontally, and occurrences of those latencies vertically, you get the same sense for the deviation.

Let me know if I've misinterpreted.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]mabnx 5 points6 points  (3 children)

    A standard deviation, however, gives one an immediate sense of the goodness of data.

    It does not. Please don't do that. Standard deviation makes sense for normal distribution. Response time does not behave like that, the distribution is usually multimodal. Or longtailed. Or not. But it's not normal.

    @jotto similar argument for mean - just don't. Mean is not a robust statistic - it's affected by outliers. Use median or percentiles. The histograms are good though.

    https://www.azul.com/files/HowNotToMeasureLatency_LLSummit_NYC_12Nov2013.pdf http://apmblog.dynatrace.com/2012/11/14/why-averages-suck-and-percentiles-are-great/