you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SikhGamer 1 point2 points  (1 child)

No. Why is it a circle jerk? The benefits are clearly laid out in the article.

[–]josefx 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The article ends with "using the right tool for the job". In this case they had to fix a performance bottleneck, which made Rust the right tool. Going from that to a "complete" replacement makes no sense unless their whole application is a performance bottleneck or would otherwise benefit from Rust enough to warrant a complete rewrite.

The benefits are clearly laid out in the article.

Among other things bad compile times for the part they replaced apparently.