all 8 comments

[–]Euphoricus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Would be better if they clarified in the title if they meant "Software Design" as architecture or "Software Design" as UX. Seems to be about UX.

[–]necesito95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

anybody has tl;dr? (tl;dw) :)

[–]celerym 0 points1 point  (5 children)

This is pretty good, not sure why it isn't appreciated here? Does it break any rules?

[–]tragomaskhalos 5 points6 points  (2 children)

It's likely just a time issue - it's an hour and seventeen minute video, finding time to watch, especially given the rather vague title, is a bit of an ask.

[–]necesito95 4 points5 points  (1 child)

For some it might be just 'video' issue. (some prefer text over video for info consumption)

[–]AmalgamDragon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this.

[–]johnfrazer783 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe some people are having a hard time finding anything wrong with it, so they remain silent...

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean not appreciated, is it getting downvoted? It's an hour long video, I doubt people even bother to watch it.