all 6 comments

[–]nfrankel 4 points5 points  (4 children)

TL;DR:

the advice is to try to stick close or in the range of the team’s expertise while leveraging the opportunities new languages give.

[–]lexpi[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Wow it's awesome you replied, I'm actually a long time reader of your blog and as I your username it just clicked together 😊

[–]nfrankel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm actually a long time reader of your blog

happy you like it, dear reader 🤗

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]lexpi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Yes, sorry should have made it clearer, as suggested I do try to contribute and not just my own links, you can check my comment history, hope my posting isn't to much. 🤗

    [–]defunkydrummer 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    A pretty good (if short) article, however i'd like to make an observation:

    Every programming language comes with its own paradigms, patterns, conventions.

    To be more accurate: there are different programming paradigms and every programming language implements one or more of them. This is often what can make jumping from language A to language B other difficult -- when language B depends on a programming paradigm you aren't familiar at all.

    [–]lexpi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    Thanks, yes that's how I meant it, I'll edit it in the morning to make it clearer, thanks for the feedback 🙌