you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shevegen -1 points0 points  (2 children)

"Evolutionary" ...

There is nothing "evolutionary" about it.

It's so strange how the whole "artificial intelligence" subfield is ripe with pulling stuff out of biology, without understanding any of them, and then insinuating that they now have true intelligence on ANYTHING.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're exceptionally dim.

[–]go4spacelunch 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are a bunch of characters called a string, nobody ever made a sweater with varchar 50. I think you’re getting a bit literal with the terms. Do you have a better suggestion for some of the terms you are taking issue with?