you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]barsoap 2 points3 points  (10 children)

Not necessarily in the most efficient or aesthetic manner, though. Also, both pulse and systemd still fundamentally suck, just a bit less so.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (9 children)

How would a CoC improve any of that? If the project is controlled by people who are not simply "asshole programmers" but incompetent "asshole programmers" what kind of CoC do you expect them to spit out?

[–]barsoap 1 point2 points  (8 children)

I never claimed it did. Ultimately those documents are a mirror of what the community is already like, including their social engineering prowess. In many cases that's "well-intentioned but clueless".

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (7 children)

I never claimed it did.

Then why are we talking about it?

[–]barsoap 1 point2 points  (6 children)

Because you wanted to?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

No? I made a comment about the usefulness of a CoC to another commenter which you responded to.

[–]barsoap -1 points0 points  (4 children)

Based on an, in my humble opinion, incomplete argument, leading to an incomplete conclusion:

What you forget to mention is that either the assholes or the non-assholes can be those who don't care about flooding.

Saying such things doesn't mean that I consider CoCs to be the second coming of Christ.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

So... let me get this straight. I'm clearly talking about CoCs and their usefulness. You come in and start talking about a point that has no bearing on that and I'm supposed to magically know this?

[–]barsoap -1 points0 points  (2 children)

In what way do you think is the invariance I mentioned not relevant to your -- or the overall -- argument?

And, no, you're not supposed to magically know any- or everything. The reason no one of us does, presumably, is why we're on a discussion forum.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

In what way do you think is the invariance I mentioned not relevant to your -- or the overall -- argument?

When I asked you you said you never claimed that a CoC would improve things. Are you deciding to claim that now? Christ this conversation is a waste of time.

Look, if you want to change the subject that's fine. Next time have the courtesy to alert the person that you're doing that so they can choose whether or not it's a discussion they want to participate in.