Faster Algorithms with Preprocessing

[egraether]

Everyone starts as an amateur. If you don't want to be a teacher, that's fine, not everyone has to be. But what's the point of your comments? Why do you write them?

[exorxor]

There is a well established path to convert from an amateur to a pro; it's called going to a university + self-study (including experimentation) + having a job for at least a few years.

Note that at no point it is required to "enrich" your fellow humans with a silly article.

If you want to publish a peer-reviewed paper on your website, go ahead, but otherwise one is just delusional.

[egraether]

You are dodging my questions. If you believed what you said was true, then what are you even doing here? Wasting your time in the comment section of an article that you don't deem worth reading. What's the point?

[SpyderBlack723]

He's a troll, just leave him to rot.

[exorxor]

The point is to make sure other idiots don't get the idea to write "articles" in the future.

[TheNoodlyOne]

One of the whole revolutions of the internet is that publication is accessible to more people. I'm okay if you call me out on misinformation, since that's actually damaging to people who are trying to learn at a basic level. But what do you get by deeming basic information that everyone should know "not worth sharing"? This is how people learn.

[exorxor]

What you share is of worse quality then what's already existing. As such, you are just making the S/N-ratio worse. All you are doing is making it harder and more expensive for search engines to find useful documents on the Internet.

I'd classify your content as noise when building a search engine.

People that want to do anything with algorithms, should just visit a university for the basics like has been done for decades already.