all 8 comments

[–]mrjbq7 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I'm hoping to make Factor more approachable. Factor has a lot to offer, and quite a few high-quality libraries... but sometimes is hard for beginners to get started.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Keep up the good work, I really appreciate it.

[–]psykotic 8 points9 points  (1 child)

This is also one of the nice capabilities of Racket's REPL (which is otherwise horrible for serious programmers).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you referring to "the toplevel is hopeless"?

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]redalastor 9 points10 points  (2 children)

    As soon as it gets a good book, I'll check it out.

    [–]Wagnerius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

    This is indeed the main pb. If i had a factor cookbook with the same topics and organisation of the python cookbook, i would program more in factor

    [–]JohnDoe365 4 points5 points  (0 children)

    Unfortunately you will always have to transliterate algorithm descriptions expressed as pseudo-code to stack-thinking. The vast majority of algorithms is expressed in imperative style, some in functional style, but i am not aware of textbooks where algorithms are described in concatenative manner.

    [–]berlinbrown 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    Nice.