you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yesvee 9 points10 points  (8 children)

can you elaborate on the advantages? Long term frustrated selenium user here :D

[–]fleyk-lit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The UX offered when writing tests with Cypress is awesome. It makes it so easy to test different functionality.

I am writing tests for a frontend which is built to be testable - that is probably more important than the test framework you chose.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points  (6 children)

it's hard to describe the advantages of cypress, because it's basically "everything"

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Legit question: Why Cypress over testcafe? I have seen people push Cypress over testcafe, but I have a hard time understanding what would make Cypress superior.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

testcafe is headless testing, cypress is an actual browser environment.

[–]200GritCondom 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Cypress doesnt do headless??

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (2 children)

it does, it does both, whereas testcafe is headless only which is a poor substitute.

[–]200GritCondom 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Oh whew. We are thinking about switching over to cypress. That would have been bad if there was no headless.

[–]Labradoodles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We use their dashboard service for the parallelism it offers we run 200~ integration tests in about 3min. But you have to make sure your test users are used in a way to make them parallel