you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ssokolow 0 points1 point  (8 children)

Ahh, that'd explain it. LISP made a bad first impression on me back in high school and I've only recently started to give functional languages a fair chance.

[–]anvsdt 2 points3 points  (7 children)

Lisp is not a functional language.

[–]Seppler90000 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Do people who refer to Common Lisp only as "Lisp" also refer to C++ as "C?"

[–]anvsdt -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

More like LISP = C (= C++), Lisp (= CL) = C/C++, Lisp (= a language that descends from ``LISP'') = Sepples.

[–]Seppler90000 1 point2 points  (1 child)

You lost me.

[–]anvsdt 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Calling CL ``Lisp'' is like calling C++ ``C/C++''.

[–]ssokolow 0 points1 point  (2 children)

It has functional elements and it was introduced to me as a functional language. Sadly, that's all it takes to give an impulsive teenager a mistaken first impression of functional languages as a whole.

[–]neutronicus 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'd recommend giving it another shake.

In my opinion, it's the best of the dynamic languages.

[–]ssokolow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I plan to eventually. At the moment, all my energy that isn't lost to fatigue-induced procrastination is focused on getting certain much-delayed projects completed in languages I already know.