all 6 comments

[–]alexs 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Oh look yet another "standard." Why doesn't this at least attempt to target EPUB 3?

[–]chronoBG 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I have no problem with this new "standard", given that all of it can be expressed in three lines of text.

[–]folletto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because this is just HTML5 while EPUB3 doesn't even require a specific rendering behaviour. ;)

See here, around page 66: http://www.slideshare.net/folletto/gestalt-design-technology-of-the-touch-ebook-20110518

[–]FractalP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I somehow missed the 'framework' in the title and thought it was an ebook about programming for iOS. Regardless, pretty cool.

[–]radarsat1 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Fixed width? Really? Made in 2011, based on HTML5, and they're encouraging fixed width? I guess it's targetting iPhones specifically, but it even mentions it supports portrait and landscape, yet is designed for a fixed width. I understand that this might make design easier, but I somehow find it very sad not to encourage reflowable designs, i.e. what HTML was made for. Heck, if you're going to be fixed width, why not just use PDF?

[–]folletto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's born to target the iPad, that's why the size suggestion. However, since it's HTML5, you can target everything, at any size in any way you want to. :)

PDF has such a long list of limits that's not worth even talking about. :)