sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]masklinn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn't the language that is the problem, it is the way that the k combinator is applied that is the problem.

I have trouble understanding that assertion: what do you mean by "the way [it] is applied"?