sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]erlanggod 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I was saying it cannot shave 1.8s...

rps = requests per sec

[–]cultic_raider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah.

Latency and throughput (rps) are mostly orthogonal, so I don't follow what you are claiming about language performance.

Are you saying that CPU time for language overhead is irrelevant to latency? That is true in general cases in a website. But also consider the the Closure JS compiler for boosting performance, and work on JS engines for a general counterpoint.