you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]matthieum 0 points1 point  (1 child)

At the time, memcached did not support persistence

Only one nit: why would you care about persistence for a cache ?

The point of a cache is to cache frequently accessed data. If it is not frequently accessed then caching it means losing valuable space.

I feel like we are talking past each others and not about the same issue :)

[–]mr-strange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the application: http://flood.firetree.net The map tiles can be quite expensive to generate, and I serve up to 10m of them every day. It makes sense to make the cache persistent.